Objectives: The three dimensional (3D) endoscope is considered as a new surgical tool which used in different approaches in intranasal and anterior skull base surgical procedures. There are many advantages of the 3D endoscopy over the two dimensional (2D) one that have been demonstrated along clinical applications, surgical training and different experimental studies. Our study aimed to show the difference between using the 3D & 2D endoscopes during endonasal and anterior skull base surgery and its importance specially when used by novice users. Design: Our study is divided into two phases (clinical & cadaveric phases).In the clinical study we have done 52 endonasal & anterior skull base surgical procedures (26 study cases and 26 control cases).We recorded accuracy, duration and intraoperative complication for each case. The cadaveric study was performed on three cadavers, difference in accuracy and dissection time were recorded using 3D & 2D endoscopy for each side chosen by randomization. Results: In the clinical study, the cases done by 3D endoscope were significantly faster and more accurate with less intraoperative complications compared to cases done using 2D endoscope. In cadaveric dissection while using 3D endoscope there was better depth of perception regarding the anatomical landmarks compared to 2D endoscope. Conclusion: 3D endoscopy is an advanced instrument that allows better training for the coming generation of ENT surgeons. Both clinical and cadaveric studies offer a promising outcomes in both endonasal and anterior skull base surgery.