loading page

The carbon footprint of different modes of birth in the UK and the Netherlands: an exploratory study using life cycle assessment
  • +5
  • Alexander Heazell,
  • Nienke A. Spil,
  • Kim Nieuwenhuizen,
  • Rachel Rowe,
  • James Thornton,
  • Elizabeth Murphy,
  • Evelyn Verheijen,
  • Clifford Shelton
Alexander Heazell
The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Nienke A. Spil
The University of Manchester Faculty of Biology Medicine and Health
Author Profile
Kim Nieuwenhuizen
Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum Oncologie Centrum Klinisch
Author Profile
Rachel Rowe
University of Oxford Nuffield Department of Population Health
Author Profile
James Thornton
University of Nottingham
Author Profile
Elizabeth Murphy
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Author Profile
Evelyn Verheijen
Saxenburgh Groep
Author Profile
Clifford Shelton
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective: To compare the carbon footprint of caesarean and vaginal birth. Design: Life cycle assessment. Setting: Tertiary maternity units and home births in the UK and the Netherlands Methods: A life cycle assessment, including: equipment use, energy, analgesia, hospital stay, waste, sterilisation and laundry, was conducted using primary data combined with data from published sources. Main Outcome Measures: ‘Carbon footprint’ (in kgCO 2e) Results: Excluding analgesia, the carbon footprint of a caesarean birth in the UK was 31.21 kgCO 2e, compared with 12.47 kgCO 2e for vaginal birth in hospital and 7.63 kgCO 2e at home. In the Netherlands the carbon footprint of a caesarean was higher (32.96 kgCO 2e), but lower for vaginal birth in hospital and home (10.74 and 6.27 kgCO 2e respectively). Emissions associated with analgesia for vaginal birth were: 0.08 kgCO 2e (opioid analgesia), 0.75 kgCO 2e (remifentanil), 1.2 kgCO 2e (epidural) and 237.33 kgCO 2e (nitrous oxide with oxygen). Differences in analgesia use resulted in a lower average carbon footprint for vaginal birth in the Netherlands than the UK (11.64 vs. 193.26 kgCO 2e). Conclusion: The carbon footprint of a caesarean is higher than for vaginal birth if analgesia is excluded, but this is very sensitive to the analgesia used; use of nitrous oxide with oxygen multiplies the carbon footprint of vaginal birth 25-fold. Alternative methods of pain relief or nitrous oxide destruction systems would lead to a substantial improvement in carbon footprint. Although clinical need and maternal choice are paramount, protocols should consider the environmental impact of different choices.
18 Jul 2023Submitted to BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
18 Jul 2023Submission Checks Completed
18 Jul 2023Assigned to Editor
18 Jul 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
02 Aug 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
02 Nov 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Major