loading page

Insight of Electrocardiographic and Electrophysiological Parameters on The Left Ventricular Function in Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmia from Left Ventricular Summit
  • +13
  • Chin-Yu Lin,
  • Ming-Jen Kuo,
  • Yenn-Jiang Lin,
  • Shih-Lin Chang,
  • Li-Wei Lo,
  • Yu-Feng Hu,
  • Fa-Po Chung,
  • Ta-Chuan Tuan,
  • Tze-Fan Chao,
  • Jonan Liao,
  • Ting-Yung Chang,
  • Ling Kuo,
  • Cheng-I Wu,
  • Chih-Min Liu,
  • Shin-Huei Liu,
  • Shih-Ann Chen
Chin-Yu Lin
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Ming-Jen Kuo
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Yenn-Jiang Lin
Taipei Veterans General Hospital

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Shih-Lin Chang
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Li-Wei Lo
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Yu-Feng Hu
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Fa-Po Chung
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Ta-Chuan Tuan
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Tze-Fan Chao
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Jonan Liao
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Ting-Yung Chang
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Ling Kuo
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Cheng-I Wu
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Chih-Min Liu
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Shin-Huei Liu
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile
Shih-Ann Chen
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Author Profile

Abstract

Introduction: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) from the left ventricular summit (LVS) is a common origin of VA, which resulting LV dysfunction in some patients. However, the predictors of LV cardiomyopathy were not well-elucidated. The present study sought to investigate the risk factor of LV cardiomyopathy and the outcome in patients with LVS VA Methods: Between 2013 and 2018, a total of 139 patients (60.7% men; mean age 53.2 ± 13.9 years-old) underwent catheter ablation for LVS VA from two centers. Detailed patient demographics, electrocardiograms, electrophysiological characteristics, and clinical outcomes were extracted for analysis. LV cardiomyopathy was defined as LV ejection fraction (LVEF) <50%. Results: Acute procedural success was achieved in 92.8 % of patients. There were 40 patients (28.8%) with LV cardiomyopathy, and the mean LVEF improved from 37.5 ± 9.3% to 48.5 ± 10.2% after ablation ( p < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, the independent predictors of LV dysfunction were wider QRS duration of the VA (odds ratio [OR]1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.04; p = 0.046) and the absolute earliest activation time discrepancy (AEAD) between epicardium and endocardium (OR 1.05; 95% confidence interval CI: 1.00-1.09; p = 0.048). After ablation, the LV function was completely recovered in 20 patients (50%). The predictors for irreclaimable LV function included wider PVC QRS duration (OR 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.17; p = 0.012) and poorer LVEF (OR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.74-0.97; p = 0.020). Conclusion: In patients with VA from LVS, PVC QRS duration and AEAD predicted the deteriorating LV systolic function. Catheter ablation could reverse the LV remodeling. Narrower QRS duration and better LVEF predicted a better recovery of LV function after ablation.
06 Dec 2022Submitted to Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
09 Dec 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
09 Dec 2022Submission Checks Completed
09 Dec 2022Assigned to Editor
12 Dec 2022Reviewer(s) Assigned
02 Jan 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
01 Mar 20231st Revision Received
01 Mar 2023Submission Checks Completed
01 Mar 2023Assigned to Editor
01 Mar 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
01 Mar 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
04 Apr 2023Editorial Decision: Accept