Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Comparison of prenatal ultrasonography and fetal MRI in diagnosing neural tube defects: A prospective observational study
  • +2
  • Mengchun Sun,
  • Gan Gao,
  • Benzhang Tao,
  • Hui Wang,
  • AIJIA SHANG
Mengchun Sun
Chinese PLA General Hospital

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Gan Gao
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Author Profile
Benzhang Tao
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Author Profile
Hui Wang
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Author Profile
AIJIA SHANG
Chinese PLA General Hospital
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accordance rate between prenatal ultrasonography and fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for varied neural tube defects (NTDs), and introduce detailed prenatal imaging characteristics of multiple NTDs. Design: A prospective observational study Setting: Chinese PLA General Hospital Population: The fetuses developing possible NTDs. Method: We prospectively followed up the fetuses and collected their data of prenatal ultrasonography, fetal MRI, and postnatal MRI examinations. Fisher’s exact test was used to perform the statistical analysis. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Main Outcome Measures: The diagnostic accordance rate of prenatal ultrasonography and fetal MRI for each involved NTD, prenatal imaging characteristics of each involved NTD. Results: We included 119 fetuses with 11 NTDs. Ultrasonography revealed a significant advantage in diagnosing spina bifida (P < 0.05) and a relative advantage in diagnosing intraspinal cyst, dermal sinus, and skin mass. MRI demonstrated intraspinal lipoma better (P < 0.05), and was appropriate for identifying complex malformations. Both could accurately diagnose tethered cord syndrome (without intraspinal lesions), meningocele/myelomeningocele, and sacrococcygeal teratoma. Conclusions: Prenatal ultrasonography and fetal MRI have different advantages in diagnosing NTDs. To ensure a prompt and accurate diagnosis, it is crucial for clinicians to raise awareness of the prenatal imaging characteristics of various NTDs, which will lay a solid foundation for better fetal prognosis. Funding: This study was supported by the Capital’s Funds for Health Improvement and Research (CFH2022-2-5022). Keywords: prenatal ultrasonography, fetal magnetic resonance imaging, neural tube defects, pregnancy, diagnosis, fetus