The effect of ‘compulsory’ indications for antibacterial prescriptions
in hospital prescribing software
Abstract
Aim Indications for medicines are poorly recorded in prescriptions at
our hospitals. Indications are ‘optional’ on paper prescriptions but can
be mandated in electronic prescriptions. As part of an initiative to
improve indication documentation for antimicrobial medicines, a
prospective controlled study of compulsory indications for antibacterial
medicines was undertaken. Our aim was to assess the effect of making
indications compulsory in an electronic prescribing and administration
(ePA) system. Methods Compulsory indications on prescriptions were
implemented in our tertiary hospital ePA system for eight antibacterial
medicines. The proportion of ‘credible indications’ following the
intervention for these medicines was compared with 23 antibacterial
medicines with pre-existing (positive control) and 71 without (negative
control) compulsory indications. Documented indications for all
antibacterial medicines four weeks before and after implementation of
compulsory indications were extracted from the ePA system and manually
classified as ‘credible indication’, ‘other text’, ‘rubbish text’, or
‘blank’. Results The proportion of ‘credible indications’ for the
intervention group had an absolute increase of 64.8%, from 12.5%
(270/2166) to 77.3% (1684/2179). In the intervention group ‘rubbish
text’ increased by 1.3% (from 0.05% to 1.3%), ‘other text’ increased
from 5.4% to 15.3%, and ‘blank’ decreased from 82.1% to 6.1%. For
antibacterials with no compulsory indication ‘credible indications’
increased from 22.0% (793/3611) to 46.0% (1667/3621), and in those
with pre-existing compulsory indications from 80.3% (191/238) to 83.2%
(183/220). Conclusion Implementation of compulsory indications for
antibacterial medicines in the ePA system increased ‘credible
indications’ substantially with a small increase in ‘rubbish text’.