loading page

Characteristic Time Scales of Reservoir Evaporation in a Subarctic Climate
  • +4
  • Adrien Pierre,
  • Daniel Nadeau,
  • Antoine Thiboult,
  • Alain N. Rousseau,
  • Alain Tremblay,
  • Pierre-Erik Isabelle,
  • François Anctil
Adrien Pierre
Universite Laval Departement de Genie Civil et de Genie des Eaux

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Daniel Nadeau
Universite Laval Departement de Genie Civil et de Genie des Eaux
Author Profile
Antoine Thiboult
Universite Laval Departement de Genie Civil et de Genie des Eaux
Author Profile
Alain N. Rousseau
INRS Eau Terre Environnement
Author Profile
Alain Tremblay
Hydro-Quebec
Author Profile
Pierre-Erik Isabelle
Universite Laval Departement de Genie Civil et de Genie des Eaux
Author Profile
François Anctil
Universite Laval Departement de Genie Civil et de Genie des Eaux
Author Profile

Abstract

Water bodies such as lakes and reservoirs affect the regional climate by acting as heat sinks and sources through the evaporation of substantial quantities of water over several months of the year. Unfortunately, energy exchange observations between inland water bodies and the atmosphere remain rare in northeastern North America, which has one of the highest densities of lakes in the world. This study helps to fill this gap by analyzing field observations collected from a subarctic hydropower reservoir (50.69°N, 63.24°W) characterized by a mean depth of 44 m and a surface area of 85 km 2. Two eddy covariance (EC) systems, one on a raft and one onshore, were deployed from 27 June 2018 to 12 June 2022. The thermal regime of the reservoir was monitored using vertical chains of thermistors. Results indicate a mean annual evaporation rate of 590 ± 66 mm (~70% of the annual precipitation), with 84% of the evaporation occurring at a high rate from August to freeze-up in late December through episodic pulses. It was difficult to close the energy balance because of the magnitude and the large time lag of the heat storage term. In order to circumvent this problem, we opted to perform calculations for a year that started from the first of March, as the heat storage in the water column was at its lowest at that point and could thus be ignored. From June to December, monthly Bowen ratios increased from near-zero negative values to about 1.5. After September, due to smaller vapor pressure deficits, latent heat fluxes steadily declined until an ice cover sealed up the reservoir. Two opposite diurnal cycles of sensible and latent heat fluxes were revealed during the open water period, with sensible heat fluxes peaking at night and latent heat fluxes peaking in the afternoon.
15 Sep 2022Submitted to Hydrological Processes
19 Sep 2022Submission Checks Completed
19 Sep 2022Assigned to Editor
19 Sep 2022Reviewer(s) Assigned
08 Nov 2022Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
10 Nov 2022Editorial Decision: Revise Major
10 Dec 20221st Revision Received
10 Dec 2022Submission Checks Completed
10 Dec 2022Assigned to Editor
10 Dec 2022Reviewer(s) Assigned
02 Jan 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
05 Feb 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
06 Feb 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
14 Feb 20232nd Revision Received
15 Feb 2023Submission Checks Completed
15 Feb 2023Assigned to Editor
15 Feb 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
15 Feb 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
21 Feb 2023Editorial Decision: Accept