We evaluate cloud simulations using satellite simulators against multiple observational datasets. These simulators have been run within the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory’s Atmosphere Model version 4.0 (AM4.0), as well as an alternative configuration where a two-moment Morrison-Gettelman bulk cloud microphysics with prognostic precipitation (MG2) is applied, denoted as AM4-MG2. The modelled cloud spatial distributions, vertical profiles, phase partitioning, cloud-to-precipitation transitions, and radiative effects from AM4.0 and AM4-MG2 compare reasonably well with satellite observations. Model biases include the underestimate of total and low-level clouds, especially optically thin/intermediate clouds, but the overestimate of optically thick clouds, indicating “too few, too bright’ biases. These biases compensate each other and result in reasonable estimates of cloud radiative effects. The underestimate of low-level clouds is associated with too frequent and too early drizzle/precipitation formation. The precipitation bias is improved in AM4-MG2, where the autoconversion scheme initiates the precipitation more realistically.

The newest atmospheric climate model at GFDL, AM4, succeeded at significantly reducing the toa radiative flux biases as compared to CERES observations. Despite a relatively low top-of-atmosphere sensitivity to uniform warming of SSTs (Cess warming experiments), the corresponding coupled climate model, CM4, has high transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities. We will present a systematic picture of the modeled clouds across a hierarchy of model configurations which utilize this atmospheric model. This hierarchy includes the CFMIP Aquaplanet and AMIP experiments, fully coupled model experiments (using GFDL’s CM4 model) as well as additional AMIP-like experiments with particular SST patterns. This demonstrates the large range of sensitivities that are possible from a single atmospheric climate model. Looking at the global mean radiative feedbacks across the different model configurations as well as in the context of CMIP5 and CMIP6 models will allow us to assess to what extent the cloud feedbacks in the idealized experiments relate to the fully coupled experiments and to observed clouds.

Previous work has found that as the surface warms the large-scale tropical circulations weaken, convective anvil cloud fraction decreases, and atmospheric static stability increases. Circulation changes inevitably lead to changes in the humidity and cloud fields which influence the surface energetics. The exchange of mass between the boundary layer and the midtroposphere has also been shown to weaken in global climate models. What has remained less clear is how robust these changes in the circulation are to different representations of convection, clouds, and microphysics in numerical models. We use simulations from the Radiative‐Convective Equilibrium Model Intercomparison Project (RCEMIP) to investigate the interaction between overturning circulations, surface temperature, and atmospheric moisture. We analyze the underlying mechanisms of these relationships using a 21-member model ensemble that includes both general circulation models and cloud resolving models. We find a large spread in the change of intensity of the overturning circulation. Both the range of the circulation intensity, and its change with warming can be explained by the range of the mean upward vertical velocity. There is also a consistent decrease in the exchange of mass between the boundary layer and the midtroposphere. However, the magnitude of the decrease varies substantially due to the range of responses in both mean precipitation and mean precipitable water. This work implies that despite well understood thermodynamic constraints, there is still a considerable ability for the cloud fields and the precipitation efficiency to drive a substantial range of tropical convective responses to warming.