Utilising magnetic field measurements made by the Iridium satellites and by ground magnetometers in North America we calculate the full ionospheric current system and investigate the substorm current wedge. The current estimates are independent of ionospheric conductance, and are based on estimates of the divergence-free (DF) ionospheric current from ground magnetometers and curl-free (CF) ionospheric currents from Iridium. The DF and CF currents are represented using spherical elementary current systems (SECS), derived using a new inversion scheme that ensures the current systems’ spatial scales are consistent. We present 18 substorm events and find a typical substorm current wedge (SCW) in 12 events. Our investigation of these substorms shows that during substorm expansion, equivalent field-aligned currents (EFACs) derived with ground magnetometers are a poor proxy of the actual FAC. We also find that the intensification of the westward electrojet can occur without an intensification of the FACs. We present theoretical investigations that show that the observed deviation between FACs estimated with satellite measurements and ground-based EFACs are consistent with the presence of a strong local enhancement of the ionospheric conductance, similar to the substorm bulge. Such enhancements of the auroral conductance can also change the ionospheric closure of pre-existing FACs such that the ground magnetic field, and in particular the westward electrojet, changes significantly. These results demonstrate that attributing intensification of the westward electrojet to SCW current closure can yield false understanding of the ionospheric and magnetospheric state.

We show the global dynamics of spatial cross-correlation of Pc2 wave activity can track the evolution of the 2015 St. Patrick’s Day geomagnetic storm for an 8 hour time window around onset. The global spatially coherent response is tracked by forming a dynamical network from 1 second data using the full set of 100+ ground-based magnetometer stations collated by SuperMAG and Intermagnet. The pattern of spatial coherence is then captured by a few network parameters which in turn track the evolution of the storm. At onset IMF B_z>0 and Pc2 power increases, we find a global response with stations being correlated over both local and global distances. Following onset, whilst B_z>0, the network response is confined to the day-side. When IMF B_z<0, there is a strong local response at high latitudes, consistent with the onset of polar cap convection driven by day-side reconnection. The spatially coherent response as revealed by the network grows and is maximal when both SME and SMR peak, consistent with an active electrojet and ring-current. Throughout the storm there is a coherent response both in stations located along lines of constant geomagnetic longitude, between hemispheres, and across magnetic local time. The network does not simply track the average Pc2 wave power, however is characterized by network parameters which track the evolution of the storm. This is a first study to parameterize global Pc2 wave correlation and offers the possibility of statistical studies across multiple events to detailed comparison with, and validation of, space weather models.

Substorms can be identified from negative bays in the AL/SML index, which traces the minimum northward ground magnetic deflection at auroral latitudes, produced by enhancements of the westward electrojet. For substorms, negative bays are caused by the closure of the Substorm Current Wedge through the ionosphere, typically localised to the nightside and centred around 23-00 magnetic local time (MLT). In this case, the equivalent current pattern that causes the magnetic deflections is given the name Disturbance Polar (DP) 1. However, negative bays may also form when the westward electrojet is enhanced by increased convection, driving Pedersen and Hall currents in the auroral zone. Convection enhancements also strengthen the eastward electrojet, monitored by the maximum northward ground magnetic deflection as the AU/SMU index. In this case, the equivalent current pattern that produces the magnetic deflections is called DP2. Unlike other substorm identification methods, the SOPHIE method by Forsyth et al. (2015) attempts to distinguish between the DP1 and DP2 enhancements that cause substorm-like SML bays by also examining the SMU index. Despite this, we find evidence that up to 59% of the 30329 events originally identified as substorms come from enhancements of DP2 on top of the 2627 convection enhancement events already identified between 1997 and 2020. We explore ways to improve substorm identification using auroral indices to fully separate the DP1 and DP2 bays, but conclude that there is insufficient information in the auroral indices alone to achieve this.

The three Swarm satellites provide an optimum, low Earth orbit (LEO) and multi-spacecraft platform, to explore for the first time the local correlation between field-aligned currents (FACs), auroral electrojets, and magnetic perturbations at the Earth’s surface. By Swarm and ground magnetic field data together, one can investigate systematically the full correlation chain, whose final link controls the ground induced currents and related space weather effects. We introduce an integrated FAC product, the Sheet FAC (SFAC) index, as a convenient measure of the in-situ FAC data, and check the correlations SFAC-AE, SFAC-PEJ and SFAC-dH, with AE the standard auroral electrojet index, PEJ the local, Swarm based, polar electrojet index, and dH the horizontal magnetic field perturbation at the Earth’s surface. Given the good SFAC-dH correlation, we also suggest an extension of SFAC to higher LEO satellites, which cannot observe any more the electrojet currents, but are fully capable to monitor SFAC.

Geomagnetic disturbances (GMDs) are rapid fluctuations in the strength and direction of the magnetic field near the surface of the Earth which can cause electric currents to be induced in the ground. The geomagnetically induced currents (GICs) can cause damage to pipelines and power grids. A detection algorithm has been developed to identify rapid changes in 10 second averaged magnetometer data. This higher resolution data is important in capturing the most rapid changes associated with extreme GIC events. The algorithm has been used on an array of ground-based magnetometers from SuperMAG data from 2010 to 2022, creating a new list of global GMDs. Data from the Active Magnetosphere and Planetary Electrodynamics Response Experiment (AMPERE) is used to place the observed GMDs in the context of the global pattern of magnetosphere-ionosphere field-aligned currents (FACs). A dawn sector population of GMDs is found to lie near the boundary between the region 1 and region 2 FACs, while a pre-midnight sector population is found to occur poleward of the FAC boundary on region 1 upward FACs. It is also shown that the latitude of the GMDs expands with the FAC boundary and their occurrence peaks around 77 degrees magnetic latitude.

We investigate the causes of large $dB/dt$ events observed by SuperMAG, by comparing with the time-series of different types of geomagnetic activity, or “convection state”, for the duration of 2010. Spikes are found to occur predominantly in the pre-midnight and dawn sectors. We find that pre-midnight spikes are associated with substorm onsets. Dawn sector spikes are not directly associated with substorms, but with auroral activity occurring within the westward electrojet region. Azimuthally-spaced auroral features drift sunwards, producing Ps6 (10-20 min period) magnetic perturbations on the ground. The magnitude of $dB/dt$ is determined by the flow speed in the convection return flow region, which in turn is related to the strength of solar wind-magnetospheric coupling. Pre-midnight and dawn sector spikes can occur at the same time, as strong coupling favours both substorms and westward electrojet activity; however, the mechanisms that create them seem somewhat independent. The dawn auroral features share some characteristics with omega bands, but can also appear as north-south aligned auroral streamers. We suggest that these two phenomena share a single underlying cause.

High-Intensity Long-Duration Continuous AE Activity (HILDCAA) intervals are driven by High Speed solar wind Streams (HSSs) during which the rapidly-varying interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) produces high but intermittent dayside reconnection rates. This results in several days of large, quasi-periodic enhancements in the auroral electrojet (AE) index. There has been debate over whether the enhancements in AE are produced by substorms or whether HILDCAAs represent a distinct class of magnetospheric dynamics. We investigate sixteen HILDCAA events using the expanding/contracting polar cap model as a framework to understand the magnetospheric dynamics occurring during HSSs. Each HILDCAA onset shows variations in open magnetic flux, dayside and nightside reconnection rates, the cross-polar cap potential, and AL that are characteristic of substorms. The enhancements in AE are produced by activity in the pre-midnight sector, which is the typical substorm onset region. The periodicities present in the intermittent IMF determine the exact nature of the activity, producing a range of behaviours from a sequence of isolated substorms, through substorms which merge into one-another, to almost continuous geomagnetic activity. The magnitude of magnetic fluctuations, $dB/dt$, in the pre-midnight sector during HSSs is sufficient to produce a significant risk of Geomagnetically Induced Currents, which can be detrimental to power-grids and pipelines.

The Newcomb-Benford Law (NBL) prescribes the probability distribution of the first digit of variables which explore a broad range under conditions including aggregation. Long-term space weather relevant observations and indices necessarily incorporate changes in the contributing number and types of observing instrumentation over time and we find that this can be detected solely by comparison with the NBL. It detects when upstream solar wind magnetic field OMNI HRO Interplanetary Magnetic Field incorporated new data from WIND and ACE after 1995. NBL comparison can detect underlying changes in geomagnetic indices AE (activity dependent background subtraction) and SME (different station types) that select individual stations showing the largest deflection, but not where station data are averaged, as in the SMR index. As composite indices becomes more widespread across the geosciences, the NBL may provide a generic data flag to indicate changes in the constituent raw data, calibration or sampling method.

The auroral electrojet is traditionally measured remotely with magnetometers on ground or in low Earth orbit (LEO). The sparse distribution of measurements, combined with a vertical distance of some 100 km to ground and typically >300 km to LEO satellites, means that smaller scale sizes can not be detected. Because of this, our understanding of the spatiotemporal characteristics of the electrojet is incomplete. Recent advances in measurement technology give hope of overcoming these limitations by multi-point remote detections of the magnetic field in the mesosphere, very close to the electrojet. We present a prediction of the magnitude of these disturbances, inferred from the spatiotemporal characteristics of magnetic field-aligned currents. We also discuss how Zeeman magnetic field sensors (Yee et al., 2020) onboard the Electrojet Zeeman Imaging Explorer (EZIE) satellites will be used to essentially image the equivalent current at unprecedented spatial resolution. The electrojet imaging is demonstrated by combining carefully simulated measurements with a spherical elementary current representation using a novel inversion scheme.

We use the Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) Geospace configuration to simulate a total of 122 storms from the period 2010-2019. With the focus on the storm main phase, each storm period was run for 54 hours starting from 6 hours prior to the start of the Dst depression. The simulation output of ground magnetic variations were compared with ground magnetometer station data provided by SuperMAG to statistically assess the Geospace model regional magnetic perturbation prediction performance. Our results show that the regional predictions at mid-latitudes are quite accurate, but the high-latitude regional disturbances are still difficult to predict.

Rapid changes of magnetic fields associated with nighttime magnetic perturbation events (MPEs) with amplitudes |ΔB| of hundreds of nT and 5-10 min periods can induce geomagnetically-induced currents (GICs) that can harm technological systems. In this study we compare the occurrence and amplitude of nighttime MPEs with |dB/dt| ≥ 6 nT/s observed during 2015 and 2017 at five stations in Arctic Canada ranging from 75.2° to 64.7° in corrected geomagnetic latitude (MLAT) as functions of magnetic local time (MLT), the SME and SYM/H magnetic indices, and time delay after substorm onsets. Although most MPEs occurred within 30 minutes after a substorm onset, ~10% of those observed at the four lower latitude stations occurred over two hours after the most recent onset. A broad distribution in local time appeared at all 5 stations between 1700 and 0100 MLT, and a narrower distribution appeared at the lower latitude stations between 0200 and 0700 MLT. There was little or no correlation between MPE amplitude and the SYM/H index; most MPEs at all stations occurred for SYM/H values between -40 and 0 nT. SME index values for MPEs observed more than 1 hour after the most recent substorm onset fell in the lower half of the range of SME values for events during substorms, and dipolarizations in synchronous orbit at GOES 13 during these events were weaker or more often nonexistent. These observations suggest that substorms are neither necessary nor sufficient to cause MPEs, and hence predictions of GICs cannot focus solely on substorms.

This study comprises 33 geomagnetic storms with Dst $\leq-50$ nT driven by high-speed streams (HSSs) and associated stream interaction regions (SIRs) during 2010-2017. Their impact on ionospheric horizontal and field-aligned currents (FACs) have been investigated using superposed epoch analysis of SuperMAG and AMPERE data, respectively. The zero epoch ($t_0$) was set to the onset of the storm main phase. Storms begin in the SIR portion of the HSSs with enhanced solar wind density and compressed southward oriented magnetic field. The integrated FACs and horizontal currents have two peaks. The first and largest peak occurs at $t_0+40$ min and a second peak $t_0+5.3$ h, just before the Dst minimum. Both peaks are strongly driven by the solar wind, and the correlation between the Akasofu $\varepsilon$ and integrated FAC is $0.89$. The number of substorm onsets maximises near the storm onset. The storms were also separated into two groups based on the solar wind dynamic pressure p\textsubscript{dyn} in the vicinity of the SIR. High p\textsubscript{dyn} storms are driven by HSS/SIRs, where the solar wind velocity maximum is reached earlier and has shorter lead times to storm onset than low p\textsubscript{dyn} events. The high p\textsubscript{dyn} events also have sudden storm commencements, stronger solar wind driving and ionospheric response at $t_0$, and are primarily responsible for the first peak in the currents seen $40$ min after $t_0$. After $t_0+2$ days, the number of substorm onsets becomes higher for low than high p\textsubscript{dyn} events, which may be related to higher solar wind speed.