Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

Benjamin Fildier

and 3 more

Radiative cooling on the lowest atmospheric levels is of strong importance for modulating atmospheric circulations and organizing convection, but detailed observations and a robust theoretical understanding are lacking. Here we use unprecedented observational constraints from subsidence regimes in the tropical Atlantic to develop a theory for the shape and magnitude of low-level longwave radiative cooling in clear-sky, showing large peaks at the top of the boundary layer. A suite of novel scaling approximations is first developed from simplified spectral theory, in close agreement with the measurements. The radiative cooling peak height is set by the maximum lapse rate in water vapor path, and its magnitude is mainly controlled by the ratio of column relative humidity above and below the peak. We emphasize how elevated intrusions of moist air can reduce low-level cooling, by sporadically shading the spectral range which effectively cools to space. The efficiency of this spectral shading depends both on water content and altitude of moist intrusions; its height dependence cannot be explained by the temperature difference between the emitting and absorbing layers, but by the decrease of water vapor extinction with altitude. This analytical work can help to narrow the search for low-level cloud patterns sensitive to radiative-convective feedbacks: the most organized patterns with largest cloud fractions tend to occur in atmospheres below 10% relative humidity and feel the strongest low-level cooling. This motivates further assessment of these favorable conditions for radiative-convective feedbacks and a robust quantification of corresponding shallow cloud dynamics in current and warmer climates.

Ilai Guendelman

and 9 more

Recent advances have allowed for integration of global storm resolving models (GSRMs) to a timescale of several years. These short simulations are sufficient for studying characteristics and statistics of short- and small-scale phenomena; however, it is questionable what we can learn from these integrations about the large-scale climate response to perturbations. To address this question, we use the response of X-SHiELD (a GSRM) to uniform SST warming and CO$_2$ increase in a two-year integration and compare it to similar CMIP6 experiments. Specifically, we assess the statistical meaning of having two years in one model outside the spread of another model or model ensemble. This is of particular interest because X-SHiELD shows a distinct response of the global mean precipitation to uniform warming, and the northern hemisphere jet shift response to isolated CO$_2$ increase. We use the CMIP6 models to estimate the probability of two years in one model being more than one standard deviation away from another model (ensemble) mean, knowing the mean of two models. For example, if two years in one model are more than one standard deviation away from the other model’s mean, we find that the chances for these models’ means to be within one standard deviation are $\sim 25\%$. We find that for some large-scale metrics, there is an important base-state dependence that, when taken into account, can qualitatively change the interpretation of the results. We note that a year-to-year comparison is physically meaningful due to the use of prescribed sea-surface-temperature simulations.