Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Quantitative identification of nitrate sources using stable isotopes in a drinking water source watershed of Eastern China
  • +5
  • Lu Zhang,
  • Jiangbo Han,
  • Aimin Liao,
  • Jin Lin,
  • Xue Li,
  • Yunfeng Dai,
  • Xiaomin Sun,
  • Peng LIU
Lu Zhang
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
Author Profile
Jiangbo Han
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
Author Profile
Aimin Liao
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
Author Profile
Jin Lin
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Xue Li
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
Author Profile
Yunfeng Dai
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
Author Profile
Xiaomin Sun
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
Author Profile
Peng LIU
Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute
Author Profile

Abstract

The quantitative identification of nitrate sources is of great significance for the control of non-point source pollution and the comprehensive management of water resources in watersheds. δ 15N-NO 3 - and δ 18O-NO 3 - isotopes combined with the Bayesian isotope mixing model were widely used as effective methods to identify nitrogen sources. In this study, a total of 60 surface water samples and 82 groundwater samples were collected in study area from November 2021 to October 2022, and atmospheric deposition (AD), chemical nitrogen fertilizer (NF), soil nitrogen (SN), and manure and sewage (M&S) were determined as the potential nitrate sources. Source identification by SIAR indicated that in November 2021 the M&S was the main contributor of nitrate to surface water (mean 38.1%), while NF was the main contributor to groundwater (mean 39.8%). In April 2022, NF contributed the most to surface water (38.3%), while groundwater mainly originated from SN (29.4%) and MS (29.8%). The uncertainty analysis showed that the greatest uncertainties were in SN and NF, followed by M&S and AD. Sensitivity analysis showed that the changes in the nitrate isotopic composition of M&S had the greatest effect on the results for δ 15N, whereas only the mean values of oxygen isotope values of AD had a greater effect on the results for δ 18O. The sensitivity analysis results can optimize the sampling scheme and improve the accuracy of the model predictions. Additionally, the contributions of soil nitrogen and nitrogen fertilizer to nitrate in surface water and groundwater reached 58% and 64%, respectively. Therefore, optimizing fertilizer and irrigation management is necessary to improve nitrogen use efficiency in watershed management.
25 May 2023Submitted to Hydrological Processes
27 May 2023Submission Checks Completed
27 May 2023Assigned to Editor
27 May 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
05 Jun 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
07 Aug 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
11 Aug 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Major
27 Aug 20231st Revision Received
27 Aug 2023Assigned to Editor
27 Aug 2023Submission Checks Completed
27 Aug 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
04 Sep 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
03 Oct 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
09 Oct 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
19 Oct 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending
16 Nov 2023Editorial Decision: Revise Minor
20 Nov 20233rd Revision Received
20 Nov 2023Submission Checks Completed
20 Nov 2023Assigned to Editor
20 Nov 2023Reviewer(s) Assigned
20 Nov 2023Review(s) Completed, Editorial Evaluation Pending