Abstract
Vapor Pressure Deficit (VPD, atmospheric drought) and soil water
potential (Ψsoil, soil drought) have both been reported to affect
terrestrial plant water stress, plant functions (growth, stomatal
conductance, transpiration) and vulnerability to ecosystem disturbances
(mortality or vulnerability to wildfires). Which of atmospheric drought
or soil drought has the greatest influence on these responses is yet an
unresolved question. Using a state-of-the-art soil-plant-atmosphere
hydraulic model, we conducted an in-silico experiment where VPD and
Ψsoil were manipulated one at a time to quantify the relative importance
of atmospheric vs soil drought on most critical plant functions. The
model simulates the combined effects of soil drought and atmospheric
drought on plant water potential (ΨPlant), a physiologically meaningful
metric of plant water status driving plant turgor, stomatal conductance,
hydraulic conductance or water content, and thus mortality and fire
risks. Contrary to expectations, we showed that VPD had a weaker effect
than Ψsoil on tree water stress and forest disturbances risk (i.e leaf
moisture content). While physiological responses associated with low
water stress such as stomatal closure or turgor loss could be driven by
both VPD or soil drought, consequences of extreme water stress such as
hydraulic failure, leaf desiccation and vulnerability to wildfires were
almost exclusively driven by low Ψsoil. Our results therefore suggest
that most plant functions are affected by VPD through its cumulative
effect on Ψsoil via increased plant transpiration, rather than through a
direct instantaneous effect on plant water potential. We argue that
plant hydraulics provide a strong foundation for predicting tree and
terrestrial ecosystem responses to climate changes and propose a list of
explanations and testable hypotheses to reconcile plant hydraulic theory
and observations of soil and atmospheric drought effects on plant
functions.