Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

Mark Nessel

and 33 more

Animal stoichiometry influences critical processes from organismal physiology to biogeochemical cycles. However, it remains uncertain whether animal stoichiometry follows predictable scaling relationships with body mass and whether adaptation to terrestrial or aquatic environments constrains elemental allocation. We tested both interspecific and intraspecific body-mass scaling relationships for nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and N:P content using a subset of the StoichLife database, which includes 9,933 individual animals across 1,543 species spanning 10 orders of magnitude in body mass from terrestrial, freshwater, and marine realms. Our results show that body mass predicts intraspecific stoichiometric variation, accounting for 42-45% of the variation in 27% of vertebrate and 35% of invertebrate species. However, body mass was less effective at explaining interspecific variation, with taxonomic identity emerging as a more significant factor. Differences between aquatic and terrestrial organisms were observed only in invertebrate interspecific %N, suggesting that realm has a relatively minor influence on elemental allocation. Our study, based on the most comprehensive animal stoichiometry database to date, revealed that while body mass is a good predictor of intraspecific elemental content, it is less effective for interspecific patterns. This highlights the importance of evolutionary history and taxonomic identity over general scaling laws in explaining stoichiometric variation.

Boris Levin

and 7 more

Trophic specialization plays a major role in ecological speciation. Multiple adaptive radiations among cyprinid fish of the genus Labeobarbus were recently discovered in riverine environments of the Ethiopian Highlands, East Africa. These radiations contain parallel diversifications of trophic morphology, including thick-lipped or ‘rubberlip’ phenotype, whose trophic function remains largely unexplored. To test the adaptive value of thickened lips, to identify the ecological niche of the thick-lipped ecomorphs, and to test of these ecomorphs are the products of speciation we studied six sympatric pairs of ecomorphs with hypertrophied lips and the normal lip structure from different riverine basins. Trophic morphology, diet, stable isotope (15N and 13C) signatures as well as mtDNA markers and genome-wide SNP variation were analyzed. Our results show that thick-lipped ecomorphs partition trophic resources with generalized ecomorphs in only one half of the examined sympatric pairs despite the pronounced divergence in lip structure. In these thick-lipped ecomorphs that were trophically diverged, the data on their diet along with the elevated 15N values suggest an insectivorous specialization different from the basal omnivorous-detritivouros feeding mode of generalized ecomorphs. Genetic data confirmed an independent and parallel origin of all six lipped ecomorphs. Yet, only one of those six thick-lipped ecomorphs had a notable genetic divergence with sympatric non-lipped ecomorphs based on nuclear SNPs data (FST = 0.21). Sympatric pairs can be sorted by combinations of phenotypic, ecological, and genetic divergence within the speciation continuum from an ecologically non-functional mouth polymorphism via ecologically functional polymorphism to completed speciation via divergent evolution.