loading page

Cumulative outcomes of minimal stimulation IVF for severe diminished ovarian reserve women: A retrospective cohort study
  • +3
  • Nan Lu,
  • Yan Gao,
  • Yanqiu Hu,
  • Chunyan Jiang,
  • Feiyang Diao,
  • Jiayin Liu
Nan Lu
Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital Department of General Surgery
Author Profile
Yan Gao
Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital Department of General Surgery
Author Profile
Yanqiu Hu
Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital Department of General Surgery
Author Profile
Chunyan Jiang
Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital Department of General Surgery
Author Profile
Feiyang Diao
Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital Department of General Surgery
Author Profile
Jiayin Liu
Jiangsu Province Hospital and Nanjing Medical University First Affiliated Hospital Department of General Surgery

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile

Abstract

Objective - To analyze the effectiveness of minimal stimulation protocol of IVF treatment for patients with severe diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), especially for whom failed with several cycles of conventional stimulation IVF protocols previously. Design, setting and sample A single center retrospective cohort study of undergoing IVF during January 1st, 2005 to December 31st, 2021. A total of 1,111 conventional stimulation cycles and 14,139 cycles of minimal stimulation IVF cycles were analyzed. Methods - Women who had undergone minimal stimulation protocol for IVF treatment and who met the study design were admitted to the study. Patients who met the study design undergone conventional stimulation IVF cycles were also included as control. Basic characteristics and clinical outcomes were all recorded and matched for the analysis of the effectiveness of minimal stimulation IVF treatment. Main Outcome Measures – The number of oocytes retrieved, the number of embryos obtained and gonadotrophin stimulation dosage, stimulation days and clinical pregnancy rates were analyzed. Results - In 16 years, a total of 14,139 cycles of minimal stimulation IVF cycles were included into this study in order to compare the effectiveness of the minimal stimulation cycles and the conventional stimulation cycles. Although a smaller number of oocytes was retrieved in the minimal stimulation cycles compared with the conventional stimulation cycles (1.39 vs 2.26, p<0.05), the similar pregnancy rates were obtained in both groups (16.93% vs 18.99%). There were also no differences in live birth and miscarriage rates in the minimal stimulation cycles compared with the conventional cycles. Further analysis indicates that the clinical outcomes were reduced significantly after two cycles of conventional stimulation cycles with high dosage of gonadotropins in those women with DOR. Conclusion- Cumulative minimal stimulation IVF treatment is an effective alternative for women with severe DOR. If a woman with DOR is seeking fertility treatment, it is wise to turn to minimal stimulation protocol after no more than two cycles of the conventional stimulation.