loading page

Clinical Decision Support for Pediatric Home Pulse Oximetry Orders
  • +4
  • Heidi Herrick,
  • Meghan McNamara,
  • Kimberly Albanowski,
  • Erin Pohl,
  • Sara B. DeMauro,
  • Christopher Bonafide,
  • Naveen Muthu
Heidi Herrick
University of Pennsylvania Department of Pediatrics

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Meghan McNamara
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Author Profile
Kimberly Albanowski
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Author Profile
Erin Pohl
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Author Profile
Sara B. DeMauro
University of Pennsylvania Department of Pediatrics
Author Profile
Christopher Bonafide
University of Pennsylvania Department of Pediatrics
Author Profile
Naveen Muthu
Emory University Department of Pediatrics
Author Profile

Abstract

Objective: Home pulse oximetry is often prescribed to children with chronic disease upon hospital discharge. Children monitored at home may generate >20 alarms every 8 hours, contributing to premature discontinuation of monitoring. We aimed to improve the home oximetry ordering process using clinical decision support (CDS), supporting more liberal oxygen saturation (SpO 2) alarm limits. Methods: Within a large single-center improvement project to increase informativeness of alarms in the hospital and in patients’ homes, we compared home care oximetry orders of discharged children pre-post CDS implementation. Order parameters included low SpO 2 limit, specification of intensity of use, an intervention plan, pulse oximetry probe prescription, and order completeness. We extracted order details 6 months pre-CDS and 6 months post-CDS with a one-month washout period. The CDS intervention used a letter template to include all required home oximeter order elements and provide more liberal age-specific default alarm limits. Results: There were 100 orders in the pre-CDS epoch (7/1/2021-12/31/2021) and 112 orders in the post-CDS epoch (2/1/2022-7/31/2022). The median low SpO 2 alarm limit post-CDS implementation (87%, IQR 87%-90%) was significantly lower than pre-CDS (90%, IQR 90%-90%, p=<0.001). In the post-CDS epoch significantly more orders included an intervention plan (80.4% versus 31%, p<0.001), prescribed pulse oximeter probes (85.7% versus 52.0%, p<0.001), and were complete (68.8% versus 13.0%, p<0.001). Conclusions: CDS implementation resulted in a significant decrease in median low SpO 2 limit and a significant increase in home oximetry order completeness. These changes may decrease home oximetry alarm burden and improve caregiver experiences with home oximetry.