This article provides a new take on the impact brought by Grid Forming (GFM) converters by showing that not all GFM converters improve the system stability with the same efficacy. It paper investigates the mechanisms behind converters driven stability and quantifies the stabilizing effect of grid-forming controls. The linearized state space model of different combinations of control strategies is analyzed in a multi-infeed system considering various operating points. Through a parametric sensitivity study and an examination of the participation factors of key eigenvalues of the linearized models, it is confirmed that grid-forming controls contribute to system stabilization. Moreover, this paper demonstrates that this stabilizing effect varies significantly depending on the specific grid-forming control implemented: whether a current control loop is used or not, notably impacts stability.

To insure a stable and reliable operation of the existing and future grids, it is important to study the stability of the power electronic based converters’ controls which can replace synchronous generation. Most existing studies use a Thévenin equivalent model of the grid to test the grid following controls. The present article demonstrates the limits of these studies. An alternative setup is proposed and is shown to provide more insight into the underlying mechanisms of the grid following control behaviour in weak grids, using a linearized state space model. These insights are exploited to propose further improvements to the control. These improvements are shown to extend the stability of the control while reducing the interactions among converters.