Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

The Importance of Electrode-Tissue Proximity in Creating Durable Pulsed Field Ablation Lesions: Insights From a Preclinical Model
  • +5
  • Nishaki Mehta,
  • Daniel Pinkhas,
  • Lars Mattison,
  • Daniel C. Sigg,
  • Nicole Kirchhof,
  • Al Patequi,
  • Peter Khalil,
  • David E. Haines
Nishaki Mehta
Corewell Health Beaumont Hospital

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Daniel Pinkhas
Corewell Health Beaumont Hospital
Author Profile
Lars Mattison
Medtronic Ltd
Author Profile
Daniel C. Sigg
Medtronic Ltd
Author Profile
Nicole Kirchhof
Medtronic Ltd
Author Profile
Al Patequi
Abbott Cardiovascular Structural Heart Division
Author Profile
Peter Khalil
Corewell Health Beaumont Hospital
Author Profile
David E. Haines
Corewell Health Beaumont Hospital
Author Profile

Abstract

Background: We sought to evaluate the anatomic and functional lesion development over time at different atrial sites immediately following delivery of pulsed field ablation (PFA). Methods: Using a porcine model, PFA ablations were performed in the superior vena cava (SVC), right atrial lateral wall (RA), left atrial appendage (LAA) and right superior pulmonary vein using four different PFA profiles. Mapping was done sequentially in 5–20-minute increments up to 280-minutes post lesion delivery for low voltage area (LVA) assessment and conduction velocity. Lesion characteristics were noted with voltage mapping immediately post ablation and at the serial time points. Results: In 9 animals, 33 sites were ablated. None of the four different profiles across all sites any statistical difference on acute lesion formation or persistence. Higher tissue contact was observed in the SVC and RSPV and lower tissue contact was observed in the LAA and RA locations. Higher contact areas were noted to have higher density electroanatomic low voltage area (LVA) (12/14 vs 5/18, p=0.01) and larger lesions on gross pathology (2 /14 vs 6/16, p =0.01) compared to lower contact areas. Lesion regression occurred in 16/33 sites. Sustained lesions were significantly more prevalent in higher versus lower contact sites (65% vs 38%, p=0.037). Conclusion: The development of significant and durable lesions for PFA appears to be dependent on tissue proximity and contact.