Artificial intelligence vs. statistical modeling for optimization of
recombinant antibody fragment production
Abstract
Maximizing the recombinant protein yield necessitates optimizing the
production medium. This can be done using a variety of methods,
including the conventional “one-factor-at-a-time” approach and more
recent statistical and mathematical methods like the artificial neural
network ANN (artificial neural network), GA (genetic algorithm), etc.
Every approach has advantages and disadvantages of its own, yet even
when a technique has flaws, it is nevertheless used to get the best
results. Here, one categorical variable and four numerical parameters
including post-induction time, inducer concentration, post-induction
temperature, and cell density of induction time were optimized using the
232 experimental assays of the CCD (central composite design). The
direct and indirect effects of factors on the yield of anti-EpEx
(anti-EpCAM extracellular domain) fragment antibody were examined using
statistical methods. Induction at the cell density of 0.7 and an IPTG
(Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside) concentration of 0.6 mM for 32
hours at 30 °C in BW25113 was the ideal culture condition leading to the
protein yield of 259.51 mg/L. Under the optimum condition, the output
values predicted by the ANN model (259.83 mg/L) was more in line with
the experimental data (259.51 mg/L) than the RSM (response surface
methodology) (276.13 mg/L) expected value. This outcome demonstrated
that the ANN model outperforms the RSM in terms of prediction accuracy.