Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

Red List criteria are ill-suited for the majority of terrestrial animal biodiversity
  • +5
  • Robert Goodsell,
  • Ayco Tack,
  • Fredrik Ronquist,
  • Laura van Dijk,
  • Elzbieta Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht,
  • Andreia Miraldo,
  • Tomas Roslin,
  • Jarno Vanhatalo
Robert Goodsell
Swedish Museum of Natural History
Author Profile
Ayco Tack
Stockholm University Faculty of Natural Sciences
Author Profile
Fredrik Ronquist
Swedish Museum of Natural History
Author Profile
Laura van Dijk
Stockholm University
Author Profile
Elzbieta Iwaszkiewicz-Eggebrecht
Swedish Museum of Natural History
Author Profile
Andreia Miraldo
Swedish Museum of Natural History
Author Profile
Tomas Roslin
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Jarno Vanhatalo
Helsingin Yliopisto
Author Profile

Abstract

Among the most widely used information underpinning conservation is the concept of Red-Listing species according to criteria developed by the IUCN. The Red List designates species extinction risk based on geographic range, population size, or declines in either. However, it has frequently been questioned whether Red List criteria are appropriate for terrestrial arthropods, which comprise the bulk of animal diversity. Due to their small size, difficulty in identification, and inherent rarity, many invertebrates are hard to study, making Red List criteria hard to apply. We assess this criticism using empirical evidence from one of the largest terrestrial arthropod surveys to date, documenting the abundance and distribution of over 13,000 species in Sweden. Of these taxa, 13% have been found at a single site, and 11% of species are found only in a single weekly sample. Using these data we demonstrate that estimates of trends based on low sample sizes are associated with major uncertainty and a major risk of misclassification under IUCN criteria. We argue that even the most ambitious monitoring efforts are unlikely to produce enough observations to reliably estimate population sizes and ranges for more than a fraction of species. Thus, there is likely to be substantial uncertainty in classifying most species according to current criteria. In response, we discuss the adaptation of IUCN criteria to more accurately capture the conservation needs of invertebrates, and to adequately assess the future of the majority of global animal diversity.