Abstract
The Acoustic Complexity Index (ACI) is one of the most used metrics in
ecoacoustics, demonstrating reliability across a broad range of
environments and ecological conditions. However, this index requires
specific procedures to be applied in the correct way. Based on the
“Canberra metric,” the ACI is an unsupervised metric formulated to
extract information from fast Fourier transform (FFT) sonic matrices.
The ACI measures contiguous differences in acoustic energy of each
frequency bin i along temporal steps (ACItf) and of a temporal interval
j along the frequency bins (ACIft). The aggregation of data after an FFT
using a clumping procedure allows for better scaling of the sonic
signals before the computation of the ACI. The application of a filter
to reduce the effects of non-environmental signals produced by
microphone electrical noise is mandatory to avoid masking effects. Due
to a singularity of the index for values equal to 0, ACIs require ad hoc
procedures to exclude from the comparisons pairs of elements of which
one is equal to 0. The spectral sonic signature and temporal sonic
signature are vectors obtained from the sequence of ACItf and ACIft
values, respectively. The comparison between sonic signatures using the
chord distance index returns spectral and temporal sonic dissimilarities
that allow the evaluation of sonic patterns emerging at different
temporal and spatial resolutions. The number of frequency bins, sonic
variability, and sonic evenness are further derivative metrics that help
to interpret sonic heterogeneity by distinguishing the temporal and
spatial heterogeneity of sonoscapes. A change of the name of the
“Acoustic Complexity Index” to the “Sonic Heterogeneity Index” is
recommended.