Analysis and review of more than 7 million prescriptions in medical
institutions in Beijing from 2020 to 2022(Part 1): Oncology treatment
medicine
Abstract
Abstract Aim To analyze prescription review results in Beijing and to
provide references for improving prescription rationality. Methods This
study included outpatient prescriptions which were randomly extracted in
Beijing from 2020 to 2022. Drug names were used as search keywords. The
changes in prescriptions number and irrationality rate over the past
three years were analyzed. Drugs associated with irrational
prescriptions were sampled and the reasons for their irrational use were
analyzed. Results Approximately 1.9 million prescriptions were sampled
for 2020-2021, and more than 4 million prescriptions were sampled for
2022. The proportion of Modern medicine (abbreviated medicine)
prescriptions of oncology treatment gradually increased while the
proportion of Traditional Chinese Medicine(TCM) prescriptions gradually
decreased from 2020 to 2022. The irrationality rate of medicine
prescriptions briefly decreased in 2021 before increasing again in 2022.
The irrationality rate of TCM prescriptions gradually decreased, and the
average irrationality rate of medicine prescriptions was higher than
that of TCM. Notably, the rationality of several drugs didn’t improve
over the past three years, which included fluorouracil (injection),
lobaplatin,bleomycin,Goserelin Acetate Sustained-release Depot
,Pabolizumab,vaginal preparations of recombinant human interferon.
Conclusion Prescription review can improve prescription rationality and
systematically identify off-label drug use, becoming an important way to
expand drug clinical use and improve drug regulatory policies. The use
of TCM in oncology treatment is becoming more rational, while the
rational use of medicine still needs to be improved. Doctors should
regulate their prescribing behavior and strive to increase the
rationality of prescriptions.