loading page

Photosynthetic responses to changes in plant water use strategy depend on atmospheric feedbacks and modify the magnitude of response to elevated CO2
  • +12
  • Amy X. Liu,
  • Claire M. Zarakas,
  • Benjamin G. Buchovecky,
  • Linnia R. Hawkins,
  • Alana S. Cordak,
  • Ashley E. Cornish,
  • Marja Haagsma,
  • Gabriel J. Kooperman,
  • Christopher J. Still,
  • Charles D. Koven,
  • Alexander J. Turner,
  • David S. Battisti,
  • James T. Randerson,
  • Forrest M. Hoffman,
  • Abigail L.S. Swann
Amy X. Liu
University of Washington

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Claire M. Zarakas
University of Washington
Author Profile
Benjamin G. Buchovecky
University of Washington
Author Profile
Linnia R. Hawkins
Columbia University
Author Profile
Alana S. Cordak
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Ashley E. Cornish
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Marja Haagsma
Oregon State University
Author Profile
Gabriel J. Kooperman
University of Georgia
Author Profile
Christopher J. Still
Oregon State University
Author Profile
Charles D. Koven
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (DOE)
Author Profile
Alexander J. Turner
University of Washington
Author Profile
David S. Battisti
University of Washington
Author Profile
James T. Randerson
University of California, Irvine
Author Profile
Forrest M. Hoffman
Oak Ridge National Laboratory (DOE)
Author Profile
Abigail L.S. Swann
University of Washington
Author Profile

Abstract

Stomata on leaves mediate fluxes of carbon and water between terrestrial plants and the atmosphere. The marginal water cost of carbon reflects plant water use strategy and is governed by stomatal conductance (gs). Many Earth system models (ESMs) represent water use strategy in the calculation of gs through an empirical parameter, the stomatal slope (g1M). Here we examine how water use strategy influences photosynthesis using coupled ESM simulations by perturbing g1M to observed 5th (low water cost) and 95th (high water cost) percentiles for each plant type. "Low water cost’’ perturbations represent a strategy with more efficient water use for carbon gain and high water cost’’ represents less efficient water use. We find that high g1M reduces photosynthesis nearly everywhere, while low g1M  has regionally dependent responses. Under fixed atmospheric conditions, low g1M  increases photosynthesis in the Amazon and central North America but decreases photosynthesis in boreal Canada. These responses reverse when the atmosphere responds interactively due to spatially differing sensitivity to increases in temperature and vapor pressure deficit. Water use strategy also influences photosynthetic response to changes in atmospheric CO2, with lower and higher g1M modifying total global response to elevated 2x preindustrial CO2 by 6.4% and -9.6%, respectively. Our work demonstrates that assumptions about plant water use strategy in ESMs significantly affect photosynthesis and its response to climate. Further, photosynthetic responses to water use strategy depend on which components of the model are interactive, so its impacts on historical or future photosynthesis cannot be generalized across model configurations.