Establishing DNA-Based Strategies for Soil Biodiversity Assessment:
Insights from Carabid Beetles
Abstract
1: Molecular-based methods offer valuable opportunities to assess soil
biodiversity in diverse ecosystems. However, their reliability and
large-scale applicability depend on developing protocols and
establishing high-quality, curated local reference databases.
2: We
focus on soil macroinvertebrates and the assessment of metabarcoding
steps, namely the sample decontamination process and the efficiency of
taxa recovery, by comparing taxonomy, barcoding, and metabarcoding data.
Twenty-four sites were sampled, making up 216 pitfall traps. Following
established procedures, specimens were morphologically classified to the
lowest taxonomic level. Individuals were then pooled and went through
the metabarcoding process. We have developed three experiments: 1)
Impact of sample decontamination, where half of the samples were washed
with sodium hypochlorite, a commonly used decontaminant. 2) Carabid
specimens were identified at the species level by experts, allowing the
building of a carabid mock community and a curated reference database
for this taxon. The species recovery efficiency was achieved by
comparing individual barcoding with metabarcoding samples spiked with
DNA from the mock community.
3: Metabarcoding provided a more
comprehensive identification of taxonomic orders compared to
morphological methods, achieving a higher level of taxonomic resolution.
The decontamination process did not show a significant impact on OTU
richness, indicating that it may not be essential. Discrepancies in the
recovery of carabid species were observed in the three methods.
4: DNA
metabarcoding is a promising technique for macroinvertebrate assessment
regarding time, efficiency, and costs, while reaching greater depth in
taxonomic resolution. The common decontamination step is not crucial for
the accuracy of soil macrofauna metabarcoding, and its removal reduces
the time and effort required. Here, we demonstrate the potential use of
integrative methodologies for robust and rapid biodiversity assessments.
Additionally, we state that the reliability of molecular methods is
highly dependent on the high quality and availability of well-curated
barcode reference databases.