Changes in sensitization rates in patients with asthma and/or rhinitis in China between 2008 and 2018: a national cross-sectional studyWanjun Wang1*, Jianhong Wang2*, Guihua Song3*, Hua Xie4*, Xiaoping Lin4*, Ruonan Chai4*, Rongfei Zhu5*, Yong He6*, Jun Tang7*, Junge Wang8*, Jinghua Yang9*, Lili Zhi10*, Lin Wu11*, Yan Jiang12*, Xiaoqin Zhou13*, Dongming Huang14*, Ning Wang15*, Rui Xu16*, Yuan Gao17*, Zhimin Chen18*, Jinling Liu18*, Xiaoli Han19*, Guolin Tan20*, Jinzhun Wu21*, Deyu Zhao22*, Jianjun Chen23*, Xiwei Zhang24*, Mengrong Li24*, Yuemei Sun25*, Yi Jiang26*, Weitian Zhang27*, Qianhui Qiu28*, Chuanhe Liu29*, Jie Yin30*, Guodong Hao31*, Huabin Li32*, Yongsheng Xu33*, Shaohua Chen34*, Hua Zhang35, Shi Chen36, Juan Meng37, Dan Zeng38, Wei Tang39, Chuangli Hao40, Jing Li1†, Nanshan Zhong1†, for the China Alliance of Research on Respiratory Allergic Disease*Contributed equally†Joint corresponding authors1 National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Disease, State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University;2 The First People’s Hospital of Yibin, Sichuan;3 The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine;4 General Hospital of Northern Theater Command;5 Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science&Technology;6 The Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Ningbo University;7 Foshan First people’s hospital;8 Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine;9 GuangDong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine;10 The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, Shandong Institute of Respiratory Diseases;11 Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese;12 The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University;13 Hubei Province Maternal and Child Health Hospital;14 Boai Hospital of Zhongshan City;15 Xi’an Children’s Hospital;16 The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun-Yat University;17 The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University;18 Children’s Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health;19 Hebei General Hospital;20 Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University;21 The Women and Children’s Hospital affiliated to Xiamen University;22 Children’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University;23 Union hospital of Tongji medical college;24 The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children’s Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University;25 Yu Huang Ding Hospital;26 The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University;27 Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People’s Hospital;28 Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University;29 Children’s Hospital Capital Institute of Pediatrics;30 Chengdu First People’s Hospital;31 Tangshan Gongren Hospital;32 ENT Institute and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University;33 Children’s Hospital of Tianjin University;34 Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital;35 The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University;36 Hainan provincial people’s Hospital;37 West China Hospital of Sichuan University;38 Chongqing General Hospital, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences;39 Ruijin Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University;40 Children’s Hospital of Soochow University.

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of COVID-19 related treatment delay on subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) efficacy in patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Methods: The study was performed in 643 patients with SCIT appointments between February 1 and May 31, 2020. The clinical assessment, performed at baseline (V0) and one year later (V1), included visual analogue scale (VAS); daily symptom score (dSS); daily medication score (dMS); combined symptom and medication scores (CSMS); quality of life (QoL); self-rating anxiety scale (SAS); and self-rating depression scale (SDS) for each patient. Results: At V0, 249 patients were treated on schedule, and 394 were delayed (7 ± 4.68 weeks). Among them, 319 patients (105 on schedule, and 214 delayed) also completed the assessments at V1, with the absence of 25.39% patients due to completion of SCIT, and 25.35% patients were withdrawal. The results of all assessments were within the normal range for all patients at V0 and V1, with the exception of a slightly higher SDS score (56.13) at V0. In the SCIT delayed group. there was a significant positive correlation between the length (weeks) of the delay and SDS score, and this was significantly higher in patients with poor control of nasal symptoms. Conclusions: This study showed the long-term efficacy of SCIT for AR patients, including those who have had to delay normal therapy due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The psychological status of SCIT patients in response to lockdown of hospital services during this critical period should be considered.