Background: Several studies imply that influenza and other respiratory illness could lead to acute myocardial infarction (AMI), but data from low-income countries are scarce. We investigated the prevalence of recent respiratory illnesses and confirmed influenza in AMI patients, while also exploring their relationship with infarction severity as defined by ST-elevation MI (STEMI) or high troponin levels. Methods: This cross-sectional study, held at a Dhaka tertiary hospital from May 2017 to October 2018, involved AMI inpatients. The study examined self-reported clinical respiratory illnesses (CRI) in the week before AMI onset and confirmed influenza using baseline qRT-PCR. Results: Of 744 patients, 11.3% reported a recent CRI, most prominently during the 2017 influenza season (35.7%). qRT-PCR testing found evidence of influenza in 1.5% of 546 patients, with all positives among STEMI cases. Frequencies of CRI were higher in patients with STEMI and in those with high troponin levels, although these associations were not statistically significant after adjusting for other variables. The risk of STEMI was significantly greater during influenza seasons in unadjusted analysis (RR: 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02- 1.18), however, this relationship was not significant in the adjusted analysis (aRR: 1.03, 95% CI: 0.91- 1.16). Conclusions: In Bangladesh, many AMI patients had a recent respiratory illness history, with some showing evidence of influenza. However, these illnesses showed no significant relationship to AMI severity. Further research is needed to understand these associations better and to investigate the potential benefits of infection control measures and influenza vaccinations in reducing AMI incidence.

Background We explored whether hospital-based surveillance is useful in detecting severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) clusters and how often these events result in outbreak investigation and community mitigation. Methods During May 2009– December 2020, physicians at 14 sentinel hospitals prospectively identified SARI clusters (i.e., ≥2 SARI cases who developed symptoms ≤10 days of each other and lived <30 minute walk or <3 km from each other). Oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal swabs were tested for influenza and other respiratory viruses by rRT-PCR. We describe the demographic of persons within clusters, laboratory results, and outbreak investigations. Results Physicians identified 464 clusters comprising 1,427 SARI cases (range 0–13 clusters per month). Sixty percent of clusters had three, 23% had 2, and 17% had ≥4 cases. Their median age was 2 years (interquartile [IQR] 0.4–25) and 63% were male. Laboratory results were available for the 464 clusters a median 9 days (IQR = 6–13 days) after cluster identification. Less than one in five clusters had cases that tested positive for the same virus: RSV in 58 (13%), influenza viruses in 24 (5%), HMPV in 5 (1%), HPIV in 3 (0.6%), adenovirus in 2 (0.4%). While 102/464 (22%) had poultry exposure, none tested positive for influenza A(H5N1) or A(H7N9). None of the 464 clusters led to field deployments for outbreak response. Conclusions For 11 years, none of the hundreds of identified clusters led to emergency response. The value of this event-based surveillance might be improved by seeking larger clusters, with stronger epidemiologic ties or decedents.