Increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere usually reduces Earth’s outgoing longwave radiation (OLR). The unusual case of Antarctica, where CO2 enhances OLR and implies a negative forcing, has previously been explained by the strong near-surface inversion or extremely low surface temperature. However, negative forcing can occasionally be found in the Arctic and tropics where neither of these explanations applies. Here, we examine the changes in infrared opacity from CO2 doubling in these low or negative forcing climate states, which shows the predominant role of the stratospheric contribution to the broadband forcing. Negative forcing in today’s climate demands a combination of strong negative forcing caused by a steep stratospheric temperature inversion and a weaker positive forcing in the atmospheric window, which can be caused by a low surface temperature or a strong high cloud masking effect. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the near-surface inversion has little impact on the forcing.

Global storm-resolving model (GSRM) simulations (kilometer-scale horizontal resolution) of the atmosphere can capture the interaction between the scales of deep cumulus convection and the large-scale dynamics and thermodynamic properties of the atmosphere. Here, we assess the vertical structure of tropical temperature change in the GSRM X-SHiELD, developed by the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, perturbed by a uniform sea surface temperature (SST) warming and/or increased CO2 concentration. The simulated response to SST warming shows weakly amplified warming from the surface through the mid-troposphere before increasing to a factor of about 2.5 near the tropopause. This combination of muted warming in the mid-troposphere and amplified warming aloft is within the range of CMIP6 models at individual pressure levels but, taken together, is distinctive behavior. The response to CO2 increase with unchanged SST is an approximately vertically uniform warming, comparable to CMIP6 models, and is linearly additive with the SST-induced warming in X-SHiELD.

Recent advances have allowed for integration of global storm resolving models (GSRMs) to a timescale of several years. These short simulations are sufficient for studying characteristics and statistics of short- and small-scale phenomena; however, it is questionable what we can learn from these integrations about the large-scale climate response to perturbations. To address this question, we use the response of X-SHiELD (a GSRM) to uniform SST warming and CO$_2$ increase in a two-year integration and compare it to similar CMIP6 experiments. Specifically, we assess the statistical meaning of having two years in one model outside the spread of another model or model ensemble. This is of particular interest because X-SHiELD shows a distinct response of the global mean precipitation to uniform warming, and the northern hemisphere jet shift response to isolated CO$_2$ increase. We use the CMIP6 models to estimate the probability of two years in one model being more than one standard deviation away from another model (ensemble) mean, knowing the mean of two models. For example, if two years in one model are more than one standard deviation away from the other model’s mean, we find that the chances for these models’ means to be within one standard deviation are $\sim 25\%$. We find that for some large-scale metrics, there is an important base-state dependence that, when taken into account, can qualitatively change the interpretation of the results. We note that a year-to-year comparison is physically meaningful due to the use of prescribed sea-surface-temperature simulations.

The radiative forcing of carbon dioxide (CO2) at the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) has a rich spatial structure and has implications for large-scale climate changes, such as poleward energy transport and tropical circulation change. Beyond the TOA, additional CO2 increases downwelling longwave at the surface, and this change in flux is the surface CO2 forcing. Here, we thoroughly evaluate the spatiotemporal variation of the instantaneous, longwave CO2 radiative forcing at both the TOA and surface. The instantaneous forcing is calculated with a radiative transfer model using ERA5 reanalysis fields. Multivariate regression models show that the broadband forcing at the TOA and surface are well-predicted by local temperatures, humidity, and cloud radiative effects. The difference between the TOA and surface forcing, the atmospheric forcing, can be either positive or negative and is mostly controlled by the column water vapor, with little explicit dependence on the surface temperature. The role of local variables on the TOA forcing is also assessed by partitioning the change in radiative flux to the component emitted by the surface vs. that emitted by the atmosphere. In cold, dry regions, the surface and atmospheric contribution partially cancel out, leading to locally weak or even negative TOA forcing. In contrast, in the warm, moist regions, the surface and atmospheric components strengthen each other, resulting in overall larger TOA forcing. The relative contribution of surface and atmosphere to the TOA forcing depends on the optical thickness in the current climate, which, in turn, is controlled by the column water vapor.