Essential Site Maintenance: Authorea-powered sites will be updated circa 15:00-17:00 Eastern on Tuesday 5 November.
There should be no interruption to normal services, but please contact us at [email protected] in case you face any issues.

loading page

The Music of Rivers: The Mathematics of Waves Reveals Global Structure and Drivers of Streamflow Regime
  • +12
  • Brian Brown,
  • Aimee H Fulerton,
  • Darin Kopp,
  • Flavia Tromboni,
  • Arial Shogren,
  • J. Angus Webb,
  • Claire Ruffing,
  • Matthew Joseph Heaton,
  • Lenka Kuglerova,
  • Daniel C Allen,
  • Lillian McGill,
  • Jay P Zarnetske,
  • Matt R Whiles,
  • Jeremy B Jones,
  • Benjamin W. Abbott
Brian Brown
Brigham Young University

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Aimee H Fulerton
NOAA Northwest Fisheries Science Center
Author Profile
Darin Kopp
Oakridge Institute for Science and Education
Author Profile
Flavia Tromboni
Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries
Author Profile
Arial Shogren
University of Alabama
Author Profile
J. Angus Webb
University of Melbourne
Author Profile
Claire Ruffing
The Nature Conservancy in Oregon
Author Profile
Matthew Joseph Heaton
Brigham Young University
Author Profile
Lenka Kuglerova
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Author Profile
Daniel C Allen
The Pennsylvania State University
Author Profile
Lillian McGill
University of Washington
Author Profile
Jay P Zarnetske
Michigan State University
Author Profile
Matt R Whiles
University of Florida
Author Profile
Jeremy B Jones
University of Alaska Fairbanks
Author Profile
Benjamin W. Abbott
Brigham Young University
Author Profile

Abstract

River flows change on timescales ranging from minutes to millennia. These variations influence fundamental functions of ecosystems, including biogeochemical fluxes, aquatic habitat, and human society. Efforts to describe temporal variation in river flow—i.e., flow regime—have resulted in hundreds of unique descriptors, complicating interpretation and identification of global drivers of flow dynamics. Here, we used a cross-disciplinary analytical approach to investigate two related questions: 1. Is there a low-dimensional structure that can be used to simplify descriptions of streamflow regime? 2. What catchment characteristics are most associated with that structure? Using a global database of daily river discharge from 1988-2016 for 3,120 stations, we calculated 189 traditional flow metrics, which we compared to the results of a wavelet analysis. Both quantification techniques independently revealed that streamflow data contain substantial low-dimensional structure that correlates closely with a small number of catchment characteristics. This structure provides a framework for understanding fundamental controls of river flow variability across multiple timescales. Climate was the most important variable across all timescales, especially those lasting several weeks, and likely contributes as much as dams in controlling flow regime. Catchment area was critical for timescales lasting several days, as was human impact for timescales lasting several years. In addition, both methods suggested that streamflow data also contain high-dimensional structure that is harder to predict from a small number of catchment characteristics (i.e. is dependent on land use, soil structure, etc.), and which accounts for the difficulty of producing simple hydrological models that generalize well.