The self-force and the self-energy (Coulomb-velocity energy) of an electron moving along a rectilinear trajectory in the vacuum is analyzed numerically. It is illustrated for the first time that when the velocity of the electron approaches the light velocity in the vacuum, the Coulomb-velocity energy approaches infinitely large, so is the self-force that calculated with the Lorentz force formula. Consequently, electrons cannot be accelerated to move faster than the light in the vacuum using electric accelerators because infinite large external force may be required to make the electron cross the electromagnetic barrier of the light velocity in the vacuum. Based on the observation, the Bertozzi experiment is re-interpreted, which shows that the velocity limit is due to the intrinsic behavior of the electron that can be clearly explained with the classical Maxwell’s theory. It is obviously not so definite that this behavior of the electron is due to the effect of special relativity as claimed in text books. Therefore, the outcome of the Bertozzi experiment may be not an unquestionable experimental support to the Einstein’s theory of special relativity. It is natural to consider that neutral particles may move faster than the light velocity in the vacuum because they do not face the infinite electromagnetic self-force when they cross the electromagnetic barrier. Furthermore, a reasonable hypothesis can be made that superluminal electrons may be generated by the collision of high energy neutral particles in a collider or in the universe.
The Einstein's theory of special relativity is based on his two postulates. The first is that the laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference frames. The second is that the velocity of light in the vacuum is the same in all inertial frames. The theory of special relativity is considered to be supported by a large number of experiments. This paper revisits the two postulates according to the new interpretations to the exact solutions of moving sources in the laboratory frame. The exact solutions are obtained using the classic Maxwell's theory, which clearly show that the propagation velocity of the electromagnetic waves of moving sources in the vacuum is not isotropic; the propagation velocity of the electromagnetic waves and the moving velocity of the sources cannot be added like vectors; the transverse Doppler effect is intrinsically included in the fields of the moving sources. The electromagnetic sources are subject to the Newtonian mechanics, while the electromagnetic fields are subject to the Maxwell's theory. We argue that since their behaviors are quite different, it is not a best choice to try to bind them together and force them to undergo the same coordinate transformations as a whole, like that in the Lorentz transformations. Furthermore, the Maxwell's theory does not impose any limitations on the velocity of the electromagnetic waves. To assume that all objects cannot move faster than the light in the vacuum need more examinations. We have carefully checked the main experiment results that were considered as supporting the special relativity. Unfortunately, we found that the experimental results may have been misinterpreted. We here propose a Galilean-Newtonian-Maxwellian relativity, which can give the same or even better explanations to those experimental results.
I have made some revisions according to the advices of other researchers and submitted a new version of the theory (v4). I also have added a supplementary material for the the new version, including some detailed explanations and derivations. In the proposed theory, the total electromagnetic energy of a radiator is separated into three parts: a Coulomb-velocity energy, a radiative energy, and a macroscopic Schott energy. The Coulomb-velocity energy is considered to be attached to the sources as the same in the charged particle theory. It becomes zero as soon as its sources have disappeared. The radiative energy leaves the radiator and propagates to the surrounding space. The macroscopic Schott energy continues to exist for a short time after the sources have disappeared. It is a kind of oscillating energy and is considered to be responsible for energy exchange between the reactive energy and the radiative energy, performing like the Schott energy in the charged particle theory. As the Poynting vector describes the total power flux density related to the total electromagnetic energy, it should include the contributions of the real radiative power and a pseudo power flow caused by the fluctuation of the reactive energy. The energies involved in the electromagnetic mutual coupling are interpreted in a similar way. In the theory, all energies are defined with explicit expressions in which the vector potential plays an important role. The time domain formulation and the frequency domain formulation of the theory are in consistent with each other. The theory is also verified with Hertzian dipole. Numerical examples demonstrate that the theory may provide insightful interpretation for electromagnetic radiation and mutual coupling problems.