loading page

Species distribution model predictability doesn't always decline under novel temperature conditions
  • +9
  • Andrew Allyn,
  • Stephanie Brodie,
  • Katherine Mills,
  • Camrin Braun,
  • Keving McGarigal,
  • Nima Farchadi,
  • Elliott Hazen ,
  • Alex Kerney,
  • Nerea Lezama-Ochoa,
  • Dylan Pugh,
  • Riley Young-Morse,
  • Rebecca Lewison
Andrew Allyn
Gulf of Maine Research Institute

Corresponding Author:[email protected]

Author Profile
Stephanie Brodie
University of California Santa Cruz Institute of Marine Sciences
Author Profile
Katherine Mills
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
Author Profile
Camrin Braun
Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Department of Biology
Author Profile
Keving McGarigal
University of Massachusetts Amherst
Author Profile
Nima Farchadi
San Diego State University Department of Biology
Author Profile
Elliott Hazen
NOAA Fisheries Southwest Fisheries Science Center Environmental Research Division
Author Profile
Alex Kerney
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
Author Profile
Nerea Lezama-Ochoa
University of California Santa Cruz Institute of Marine Sciences
Author Profile
Dylan Pugh
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
Author Profile
Riley Young-Morse
Gulf of Maine Research Institute
Author Profile
Rebecca Lewison
San Diego State University
Author Profile

Abstract

Despite the rapid development and application of species distribution models (SDMs) to predict species responses to climate-driven ecosystem changes, we have a limited understanding of model predictive performance under novel environmental conditions. We aimed to address this gap using a simulation experiment to evaluate how novel ecosystem conditions and species movement influence SDM predictability. We leveraged observed sea surface temperature responses in the California Current and Northeast U.S. Shelf large marine ecosystems (LMEs) and prescribed species-response curves to simulate the distribution of a resident but mobile ectotherm, and a seasonally migrating ectotherm in each LME. For each LME and species archetype, we fitted boosted regression tree SDMs using data from 1985-2004 and then predicted the monthly probability of presence from 2005-2020 and calculated the environmental novelty of prediction month conditions. Generally, climate-driven ocean warming resulted in increasing environmental novelty over time, though patterns varied seasonally as warming caused novel conditions to increase over time in the summer and fall and decrease in the winter and spring as novel, cool conditions became more rare. Overall, predictive performance declined as novelty increased and occurred before prediction conditions became distinguishable from observation conditions. There were also unexpected increases in performance under novel environmental conditions when these novel conditions occurred at optimum species-response curve temperatures. These results highlight that environmental novelty may not always pose prediction challenges and will depend on where novel conditions map onto species-response curves. As SDM applications expand, there will be an ongoing need to maximize data quantity and quality to more fully characterize a species’ fundamental niche, explore environmental novelty relative to species-response curves, and continue to improve methods for quantifying and communicating model uncertainty. These efforts will open opportunities for model improvement and support stakeholders’ capacity to understand and integrate predictions into decision-making processes.